By John Caldwell Throughout my career at RWR Group, I’ve seen the same costly mistake repeated time and time again. A business takes its top individual performer, a brilliant operator or a star salesperson, and promotes them into a leadership role. Everyone celebrates the promotion as a success. Six months later, that new leader is struggling, their team’s performance has dipped, and the culture is starting to sour. This isn’t a rare occurrence; it’s an epidemic of what I call ‘accidental managers’. And the data backs up what I've seen on the ground for decades. A recent Chartered Management Institute (CMI) study found that a staggering 82% of managers have received no formal leadership training. Think about that. We’re handing over our most valuable assets, our people and our culture, to leaders who have never been taught how to lead. It's no wonder Gartner found that 60% of new managers fail within their first two years. We are setting them up to fail. It’s a Selection Problem, Not Just a Skills Gap We can’t just blame a lack of training. The real issue starts earlier; it's a fundamental failure in how we select leaders. Too many organisations confuse operational excellence with leadership potential. Managing a P&L or driving sales is a completely different skill set from inspiring a team, driving strategic transformation, or building a high-performance culture. It is blunt: only one in ten people possesses the natural combination of talents to be a great manager. When we promote without a rigorous process for identifying that talent, the ripple effects are enormous: Top talent walks. People leave managers, not companies. I’ve seen entire high-performing teams dismantled by one poor leadership placement. Performance craters. An unsupported manager can’t set clear goals or motivate a team, directly impacting productivity and profitability. Brand value erodes. Your leaders define your company’s culture and reputation, both internally and in the market. Ineffective leadership damages your brand from the inside out. Building a Future-Proof Leadership Pipeline The good news is that this is entirely fixable. It requires a strategic shift in how we approach leadership development, both for external hires and internal promotions. First, hire for potential, not just past performance. When we partner with businesses, we look beyond the resume. We assess for emotional intelligence (EQ), learning agility, and genuine values alignment. Does this person have the humility to learn and the resilience to lead through change? Can they build a culture, not just manage a spreadsheet? Second, onboarding is everything. A leader's success shouldn't be left to chance. The placement is just day one. True success requires a structured development plan from the very beginning, including executive coaching, mentorship, and crystal-clear expectations for the first 90 days and beyond. At RWR Group, this is at the heart of what we do. We don’t just fill a vacancy; we act as strategic partners to help you identify and nurture leaders who are equipped to drive real transformation. Building a robust leadership pipeline isn’t just good practice—it’s the ultimate competitive advantage.

Let’s call it. Most people aren’t productive, they’re just panicking in a suit . They’re chasing their tails in a tornado of meetings, emails, Slack pings, task boards, and "quick calls" that go nowhere. And when you ask them how they’re going? “Oh mate, flat out.” Yeah. Flat out… doing what? Because here’s the thing: being busy is easy . Being effective is rare. Busy people do a lot. Effective people get results. There’s a big difference, and most professionals have lost sight of it. Somewhere along the way, output got replaced with activity. Effort replaced outcomes. Time spent became more important than value delivered. And let’s be honest: a lot of people are buying their own bullshit . They're mistaking motion for progress. Praise themselves for being 'slammed’ when all they're really doing is sweating through chaos they created by saying yes to everything and finishing nothing. This isn’t just a recruitment problem. This is an everywhere problem. Recruiters sending 100 cold reach-outs a day but filling nothing. Managers drowning in back-to-back calls with no strategy behind them. Leaders caught in decks, dashboards and “quick check-ins” that don't move a single KPI. Whole teams doing cartwheels just to look productive. The worst part? Everyone knows it. But no one wants to say it. So let me: If your calendar is full and your scoreboard is empty, you’re not busy. You’re stuck. Busy is a drug. And it’s addictive. It makes you feel needed. Important. In demand. It fills the awkward silence where results should be. But it’s also the perfect cover for lack of clarity, fear of failure, and decision avoidance . You can’t be held accountable if you’re “so busy.” You can’t be questioned if you’re burning the candle at both ends. And we reward it. We praise the hustle. We applaud the exhaustion. We promote the performers who work late… even if they never win. Meanwhile the people who quietly deliver results, they get overlooked, because they’re not seen to be grinding. Insanity. High-performers don’t look busy. They look calm. They say “no” more than they say “yes”. They don’t join every meeting. They don’t reply to emails instantly. They’re not in Slack all day. Because they’re busy thinking , doing , and delivering . They know the only KPI that matters is impact . Not noise. Not motion. Not airtime. If you don’t know what that looks like, chances are you’re surrounded by performers, not producers. So what now? Ask yourself: What did I do today that actually mattered? If I stopped half my tasks, would anyone notice? Am I producing outcomes, or just managing perception? It’s not comfortable. But that’s the point. You don’t fix a culture of noise by adding more updates. You fix it by measuring results, not reputations. You fix it by rewarding effectiveness, not effort. You fix it by cutting the crap and getting clear on what success actually looks like. So, are you actually making a dent? Or just looking busy? I’d love to hear your take. Drop a comment, disagree, tag someone who needs this.  Let’s talk about it.